*DM&L.5
The
Committee proceeded to consider the report that had been prepared
by the relevant Development Management Specialists on each of the
following Applications and considered also the comments of the Town
and Parish Councils together with other representations received,
which were listed within the presented agenda report and summarised
below:
(a)
Application No: 3441/21/OPA Ward:
Bridestowe
Site Address: Astra Salvage Yard, Patchacott, Beaworthy
Development: Outline application with all matters
reserved for development 17no holiday chalets and 1no reception
building with associated car parking and amenities.
RECOMMENDATION: Conditional Consent
Conditions:
1.
Time limit for submitted RM
2.
Details of reserved matters
3.
Accord with plans
4.
Holiday use only
5.
Land contamination
6.
CEMP
7.
No occupation before parking and turning areas
provided and retained in perpetuity
8.
No occupation until Sustainable Travel Plan agreed
and implemented
9.
Surface water drainage scheme to be agreed with or
prior to reserved matters
10.
Foul sewage
11.
Highway drainage
12.
PD removal
13.
EVCPs
14.
Solar PV
15.
DEV32 compliance 20% carbon reduction
16.
Boundary treatment plan/schedule
17.
Tree reports for reserved matters
18.
LEMP/LVA
19.
Details of any exterior lighting
20.
Landscaping (soft/hard)
21.
Waste
22.
Raw materials
Key
issues for consideration:
Principle/Sustainable
Development;
Design;
Landscape;
Impacts on residential
and third party amenity;
Historic
Environment;
Highways, Access and Parking
Considerations;
Water, Flood Risk and Drainage
Considerations;
Biodiversity;
The Climate Emergency and Low-Carbon
Development;
Land Contamination and Environmental Health.
Speakers who addressed the Committee on the
application were:
Objector: Mr Steve Hiller
Supporter: Mr Callum Allen
Beaworthy Parish Council: Statement
read out on their behalf
The Planning Officer updated the Committee Members
by confirming that since the report had been written he had
received confirmation that Historic England had raised no
objections to the application. He then presented his report to the
Committee.
Mr Hiller spoke on behalf of those in the local
community who were against the development. He spoke of concerns
over flooding, plans not allowing for dog proof fencing and the
highway leading to the site being of a single track
road.
Mr Allen spoke in support of the application being
the owner of the site. He stated that he would run the site
alongside 4 other holiday units he runs.
In answering Member questions, he confirmed the
facility would be a destination holiday resort and units would not
be sold off as holiday homes.
During debate the Planning Officer confirmed that
the drainage test results had been reviewed by the local flood
authority and they were content with the results. He explained
should the application be approved the siting of the cabins could
change at Reserved Matters stage. The Head of Planning clarified
that the extant position was for B1 and B2 classification and not
just for timber manufacturing. The use of installing fencing to
secure people within the site rather than stock proofing to stop
livestock coming in was discussed.
One Member suggested the owner should be asked to
upgrade the WiFi and secure broadband
...
view the full minutes text for item *DM&L .5