Agenda item

OSDM.4/16    

Members considered a report that set out the Capital Bids to the 2017/18 Capital Programme totalling £2,525,000 and a suggested way that these Bids could be funded.  The report highlighted that all items in the proposed Capital Programme were based on budget estimates and would be subject to the normal project appraisal procedures.

In light of Members wishing to discuss elements of the exempt appendices, it was then:

RESOLVED

That in accordance with Section 100(A)(4) of the Local Government Act 1972, the public and press be excluded from the meeting during consideration of the following item of business as the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in paragraph 3 of Schedule 12A to the Act is involved.

In discussion on the exempt appendices, the following points were raised:-

(a)  There was widespread opposition expressed amongst Members to the proposed Council Chamber refurbishment project being undertaken at this time.  As a consequence, it was PROPOSED and SECONDED that

‘The proposed Council Chamber refurbishment project should be removed from the list of proposed capital projects.’

When put to the vote, this proposal was declared CARRIED.

(b)  Officer confirmed that the Market Square, Totnes Project would be undertaken in consultation with the town council.

Once all Members were content that they had no further issues to raise in exempt session, it was then

          RESOLVED

          That the public and press be readmitted to the meeting.

In discussion on the report, particular reference was made to:-

(i)  Private Sector Renewals (including Disabled Facilities Grants).  A Member urged the Council to be firm in its negotiations to ensure that the Council did not have to use any of its own Capital contributions.  In response, it was noted that the Council was being firm and it was hoped that a further update in this regard would be available in time for the Executive meeting on 2 February 2017;

(ii)  Affordable Housing.   A number of Members expressed their strong support and emphasised the importance of the proposal to include an annual contribution of £230,000 towards affordable housing provision.

It was then: