To see Letters of Representation and further supplementary information relating to any of the Applications on the agenda, please select the following link and enter the relevant Planning Reference number: http://apps.southhams.gov.uk/PlanningSearchMVC/
Minutes:
DM.61/17
The Committee considered the details of the planning applications prepared by the Planning Case Officers as presented in the agenda papers, and considered also the comments of Town and Parish Councils together with other representations received, which were listed within the presented agenda reports, and RESOLVED that:
4165/17/FUL Development site at SX809597, Steamer Quay Road, Totnes
Parish: Totnes
Application for erection of a 68 bed Care Home (use class C2) with associated car parking, refuse and external landscaping
Case Officer Update: condition no. 11 amended and additional condition seeking detail of bird and bat boxes. A condition was added re a LEMP plus an informative to say the LEMP should reflect the LEMP in outline application for the wider Riverside Development
Speakers included: Supporter – Mr Neil Rutland: local Ward Members – Cllrs Birch, Green and Vint
Recommendation: Conditional Approval
Committee Decision: Conditional Approval
Conditions (summarised below from report):
1. Time
2. Accords with plans
3. Universal condition for contamination
4. Verification Report
5. Unsuspected contamination
6. Acoustic protection
7. Fume extraction
8. CEMP
9. Electric charging points to be provided
10. Implementation of travel plan
11. Material samples to be agreed
12. Parking and turning to be provided and retained
13. Emergency rear pedestrian access to be provided prior to occupation
14. Lighting strategy to be adhered to
15. Details of hard and soft landscaping to be agreed
16. Details of boundary treatments
17. Drainage – percolation testing
18. Drainage – groundwater monitoring
19. Drainage – surface water detailed design
20. Drainage – foul
21. Drainage – maintenance
22. Construction phase drainage
23. Condition detailed bird and bat boxes added
24. Condition re LEMP added
4238/17/FUL Hidden Valley, Lavender Farm, Land at Hole Hill, Cornworthy
Parish: Cornworthy
Proposed new timber framed barn to be used for drying, processing and storing lavender with farm office and rest room (resubmission of 1270/17/FUL)
Case Officer Update: N/A
Speakers included: Objector – Mr Howard Quartly: Supporter – Ms Gill Baker: local Ward Member – Cllr Tucker (statement read)
Recommendation: Conditional Approval
Committee Decision: Conditional Approval
Conditions:
i. Commencement within three years
ii. Accord with plans
iii. Agricultural or Horticultural use only
iv. Removal if approved use ceases
v. Removal of existing structures
vi. Drainage details to be submitted and approved
0145/18/HHO 21 Pound Field, Stoke Gabriel
Parish: Stoke Gabriel
Householder application for rear single storey extension and loft conversion
Case Officer Update: Recommendation of Conditional Approval not included in report
Speakers included: Objector – Mr Ian Hancock: Supporter – Mr Andrew Horton: local Ward Member – Cllr Rowe
Recommendation: Conditional Approval
Committee Decision: Conditional Approval
Conditions (summarised below):
1. Commencement within three years
2. Accord with plans
3. Details of materials prior to installation
4. Flat roof area shall not be used as a terrace or balcony and Juliette balcony to be fitted with fixed balustrade
5. Recommendations of Ecological report to be adhered to
0421/18/HHO 21 Court Park, Thurlestone
Parish: Thurlestone
Householder application for proposed alterations and extension (resubmission of 3075/17/HHO)
Case Officer Update:The number of letters of objection was updated to 6 not 10. In the Analysis section the previous application was supported by Officers but refused by Development Management Committee and therefore the report should read This application seeks to remove the previously refused balconies and therefore overcomes Committee Members previous concerns of overlooking’.
There have been late comments by the Parish Council that state:
‘This proposal is still over bearing to the neighbours on the south and west side, with a loss of privacy and light and added noise due to the size of the balcony’.
It should be noted that in the officers report the wall to the terraced area is not necessary to ensure the privacy to neighbouring property due to the existing boundary screening, however, concerns are still raised by neighbours and therefore a condition for the 1.8m high wall should be conditioned to be retained and maintained. This is a decision for members to consider whether they wish for this condition to be retained or removed.
Speakers included: Local Ward Members – Cllrs Pearce and Wright
Recommendation: Conditional Approval
During discussion, Members acknowledged that the proposal removed the first floor balcony that had resulted in refusal of the previous application, however they noted that a Juliette balcony was proposed instead. The majority of Members felt that a full length Juliette balcony still had the potential for overlooking, and therefore a resulting loss of amenity for neighbours.
Committee Decision: Refusal
Reason: The application should be refused as being contrary to policies DP3, DEV1 and TP1 in the Neighbourhood Plan.
Supporting documents: